fredericks (
fredericks) wrote2006-08-11 08:36 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Whose Voodoo Would You Do? #3
WVWYD Version Fleetwood Mac
Whose Voodoo Would You Do? - A maybe weekly feature where
fredericks tries her damnedest to disprove the notion that she's not batshit crazy. Music groups past present AND future (admire the skills) will be presented and all you have to do is pick which member you'd, you know, do. Forget sexual orientation of the do-er (yourself) and the do-ees (the options) and just choose. Justifying one's choice is always welcome. Calls for an intervention? not so much.
This week the group is Fleetwood Mac. Formed in 1967 and limping right along through the present, Fleetwood Mac is prime example of why shitting where you eat isn't necessarily a bad thing: sometimes that drama is immortalized in chart-topping rock goodness. You can choose more than one, as I realize I shouldn't impart my monogamist ideals onto an endeavor that's quite obviously crack-fueled anyway.

[Poll #791068]
Whose Voodoo Would You Do? - A maybe weekly feature where
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
This week the group is Fleetwood Mac. Formed in 1967 and limping right along through the present, Fleetwood Mac is prime example of why shitting where you eat isn't necessarily a bad thing: sometimes that drama is immortalized in chart-topping rock goodness. You can choose more than one, as I realize I shouldn't impart my monogamist ideals onto an endeavor that's quite obviously crack-fueled anyway.
[Poll #791068]
no subject
no subject
He's cute in his current version. Back then he was rocking too much facial hair for me.
no subject
no subject
no subject