I will crush you with my Magic Stick

[fredericks]

Is it my fault that I've never been in a fight? I always thought that was a character bonus (IRL, of course). Hmph. When I'm playing I usually like to be a cleric or some sort of character that combines magicks and physical attributes, the only problem being they usually end up middling at both. Have I mentioned how much I'd like to play some old school tabletop D&D lately? Damn.

Wizard 40% Combativeness, 40% Sneakiness, 70% Intellect, 30% Spirituality

Brilliant! You are a Wizard! Wizards are spells-casters who study powerful arcane magic. While Wizards tend to be pretty fragile, some of those spells can pack quite a punch. Unlike Clerics, Wizards aren’t as good at fixing people as they are at breaking them, so watch where you toss that fireball… Your most distinctive trait is your intelligence. You're probably well learned and logical, if perhaps a bit fragile.

My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender: You scored higher than 17% on Combativeness You scored higher than 51% on Sneakiness You scored higher than 48% on Intellect You scored higher than 30% on Spirituality

Link: The RPG Class Test written by MFlowers on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test

Comments

[theoban.livejournal.com]

I always, always play a fighter. I guess I just like to hit things. With a sword. Usually a bastard sword. *sigh*

[fredericks.livejournal.com]

*grin* And you sigh about that? If I'm tabletop-ing I'll play as a fighter occasionally (once a blue moon, if our party if full of archers or *sigh* bardic elves), because even though your battle stats are pretty one-dimensional ("there's an orc army - can't roll for intellect, dexerity's for shit so can't run behind them...Fighter SMASH!") you can still shoot the shit with your fellow players. On PC based gaming I like being able to fight AND heal myself, hence the cleric leanings.