If you wish to be on my slash filter (as in I mention it, provide links, and often cackle madly about it), please let me know. No need to impinge upon people's sensibilities, right?
Current Mood:amused
Current Music:The Devil's Right Hand - Steve Earle
I'll just note fics that I come across that I found memorably good or memorably bad, as well as talk about the rabid mostly female members that make up fic-ers. There will most likely be a preponderance of slash fic mentioned, and an abundance of ridiculousness (as is often par for the course).
*grin* Btw - I thought of you specifically when I made the filter. That's not an insult in any way, just so you know. I value your LJ companionship enough to not want to annoy you with my silliness. It's a compliment of sorts.
I tend to just ignore the slash posts you make. [no offense, obviously :]
I just wonder why there's so much of it. [slash that is, not your posts] And from my understanding, it always seems to be in regards to male couplings that [to me] seem so unlikely...
I just wonder why there's so much of it. [slash that is, not your posts] Bwah! Well, hmm. Hard to say. I don't know if there's "so much of it" as the few people that create it tend to be prolific and its followers can be a little...enthusiastic? And that the couplings generally aren't part of the usual workings of things tends to make it that much more humorous/appealling. At least, that's what I've heard.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 09:58 pm (UTC)*grin* Btw - I thought of you specifically when I made the filter. That's not an insult in any way, just so you know. I value your LJ companionship enough to not want to annoy you with my silliness. It's a compliment of sorts.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 09:59 pm (UTC)Yeah, count me in. If it's links, no quotes, I don't have to worry about work-safe-ness, which was my only worry.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 09:57 pm (UTC)Count me in. ^ v ^
no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 11:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 03:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 04:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 05:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-26 06:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-26 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 06:25 pm (UTC)I just wonder why there's so much of it. [slash that is, not your posts]
And from my understanding, it always seems to be in regards to male couplings that [to me] seem so unlikely...
no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 09:00 pm (UTC)I just wonder why there's so much of it. [slash that is, not your posts]
Bwah!
Well, hmm. Hard to say. I don't know if there's "so much of it" as the few people that create it tend to be prolific and its followers can be a little...enthusiastic? And that the couplings generally aren't part of the usual workings of things tends to make it that much more humorous/appealling. At least, that's what I've heard.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-25 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-27 01:47 pm (UTC)