fredericks: (Default)
[personal profile] fredericks
Is this thing calling me an ass? Ye gods, is it so wrong that a person care???



The Romantic Lover
54% partner focus, 61% aggressiveness, 35% adventurousness
Based on the results of this test, it is highly likely that:

You prefer your romance and love to be traditional rather than daring or out-of-the-ordinary, you would rather pursue than be pursued and, when it comes to physical love, your satisfaction comes more from providing a wonderful time to your partner than simply seeking your own.

This places you in the Lover Style of: The Romantic Lover.

The Romantic Lover is a wonderful Lover Style, and is the hallmark of young love--the Romantic Lover often loves the idea of being in love, and being a wonderful lover, and so they try to bring their prospective partners every bit of joy or happiness that they can. They are the serenaders, and the ones to rent carriages in the park or take a gondola ride down a canal. The Romantic Lover is a treasure to find, though they sometimes are prone to being hurt if their advances are ignored or harshly rebuffed.

In terms of physical love, the Romantic Lover can seem shy, but usually it is simply a by-product of wanting to be perfect for their lover, and often needs some extra encouragement and re-assurance to truly feel at ease. Given a special, intimate evening, and the right lover, the Romantic Lover can be a delight in bed.

Best Compatibility can probably be found with: The Classic Lover (most of all) or the Suave Lover, or the Exotic Lover.

Congratulations!

If you enjoyed this test, I would love the feedback! Also, you might want to check out some of my other tests if you're interested in the following:

Nerds, Geeks & Dorks

Professional Wrestling

Buffy the Vampire Slayer

Thanks Again! -- THE LOVER STYLE PROFILE TEST




My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:


free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 42% on partner focus

free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 65% on aggressiveness

free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 15% on adventurousness
Link: The Lover Style Profile Test written by donathos on Ok Cupid


...I'm GLORY? She was like the worse actress EVER.
And the character was really annoying, too.


Glorificus
54% amorality, 63% passion, 54% spirituality, 36% selflessness
You probably have a complicated, multi-faceted personality. Kind of like Glory-Ben-Glorificus.

Passionate and driven with a spiritual side that comes out at times, a healthy taste for the finer things in life and a willingness to do what's necessary to achieve your ends. You're assertive and have no problems standing up for yourself. And, push come to shove, you're the closest anyone's ever come to straight-up beating the Slayer and her gang.

Congratulations!

If you enjoyed this test, I would love the feedback! Also, you might want to check out some of my other tests if you're interested in the following:

Nerds, Geeks & Dorks

Professional Wrestling

Love & Sexuality

Thanks Again! -- THE 4-VARIABLE BUFFY PERSONALITY TEST




My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:


free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 24% on morality

free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 45% on repose

free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 26% on spirituality

free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 22% on selflessness
Link: The 4-Variable Buffy Personality Test written by donathos on OkCupid Free Online Dating

Date: 2005-08-30 04:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tjfalcon.livejournal.com
"She's not a demon. She's a God."

Date: 2005-08-30 09:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fredericks.livejournal.com
She sure as hell isn't a graduate of any Shakespearean acting academies.

Isn't the line you quoted from the ending of an episode? it was the big reveal on Glory or something, right?

Date: 2005-08-30 09:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tjfalcon.livejournal.com
She was pretty bad, even in Bring It On.

And yes, it's what Travers (head of the Watcher's Council) tells the gang at the end of an episode.

Date: 2005-08-30 07:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] taii.livejournal.com
heh: [let's hope this posts right...]
The Classic Lover
40% partner focus, 38% aggressiveness, 35% adventurousness
Based on the results of this test, it is highly likely that:



You prefer your romance and love to be traditional rather than daring
or out-of-the-ordinary, you would rather be pursued than do the
pursuing and, when it comes to physical love, you concentrate more on
enjoying the experience rather than worrying about your performance.



This places you in the Lover Style of: The Classic Lover.


The Classic Lover is a wonderful Lover Style, and is the
closest it comes to the classic images of the princess in the tower, or
the romantic and chivalrous knight, or the hero/heroine from a Disney
film. The Classic Lover is a treasure to find, though it can be
difficult to do so because they sometimes tend to be shy and/or
difficult to successfully court.


In terms of physical love, the Classic Lover again can be shy,
and often needs more in terms of emotional security to feel comfortable
than some of the other Types. Given the right setting, and the right
lover, the Classic Lover can be a delight in bed.



Best Compatibility can probably be found with: The Romantic Lover (most of all) or the Devoted Lover, or the Liberated Lover.




My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 11% on partner focus
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 21% on aggressiveness
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 14% on adventurousness


Oh, and apparently, I'm Faith...
I think not

Date: 2005-08-31 12:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fredericks.livejournal.com
I still can't get over feeling faintly insulted by my results. But you're a "classic", huh? Well hel-loooooooo Nurse! *grin*

Date: 2005-09-02 07:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] candicelbj.livejournal.com
as far as buffy goes, some of the 'big bads' that theyve had were terrible, but Glory really topped the list of the most unnecessary characters. Ben was more interesting than she was.

Profile

fredericks: (Default)
fredericks

October 2013

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2025 04:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios